I’m not sure if I believe this story at all, but let’s do this anyway. These are photos of Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick outside of a London restaurant on Wednesday everning. I don’t like Kourtney’s dress one little bit! It reminds me of a French maid outfit, but the Kardashians certainly aren’t known for their sartorial prowess. Scott doesn’t look so bad, but he’s not officially part of the family yet and probably never will be since the dude admitted that both he and Kourtney (mostly her) are “so not interested” in marriage. Speaking of which, a lot of you commented that Scott seemed like a pretty funny, nice guy on the Kardashian shows, and my suspicions were also confirmed that Scott mostly plays the role of “King Douche” as the script calls for it. Now Star is trying to add to that rep with a tale about how “mean Scott disses Kourtney” by exchanging almost every gift that she gives him for cash. Here’s the story:

Kourtney Kardashian’s baby daddy, Scott Disick, seems to prefer cold hard cash to her tokesn of affection! Kourtney, 34, recently shelled out $595 for a pair of Gucci loafers for her man — only to have Scott return them days later in exchange for money. And if that weren’t bad enough, Scott, 29, left courtney’s sentimental greeting card in the box. “He doesn’t care enough,” states a pal. “He just wants money.” This isn’t the first time Scott has discarded his girlfriend’s thoughtful gifts. According to the insider, Kourtney buys him things all the time, but he “rarely keeps them.” Maybe her next gift should be a monthly allowance!

[From Star, print edition, May 6, 2013]

Yeah, I think this story is total bullsh-t although I have to ask (to those of you who watch the Kardashian reality shows) whether Scott has a job of his own besides appearing on television with the Klan? He’s obviously a dad to two children with Kourtney, but does he earn his own money, or would there actually be a reason that he might want a refund on those Gucci loafers?

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet

I don’t watch the Kardashian reality shows and only catch an occasional clip online, but it’s still fairly obvious that in a family full of douches, Scott Disick reigns as King Douche Supreme. I’m not entirely certain whether he “plays” the role as written for him or whether that’s his true personality. He did recently make some awful remarks (which were widely circulated) about Kourtney’s postpartum weight after she gave birth to their second child, Penelope, last year. After he picked on her for weighing 115 pounds, Kourtney insisted that she was trying to lose weight in a healthful, sustainable manner, and Scott responded, “Just do it faster. You’re my piece of machinery.” Nice guy, right?

In light of Kourtney sticking with Scott despite all of his douchey ways, I assumed that if anything, she was desperate for some sort of marriage proposal (after all, they’ve been together for seven years), and he was only interested in getting the milk for free. However, Scott tells Ryan Seacrest that he’s the one who always wanted to marry Kourtney, but she wasn’t interested, so he’s dropped the entire subject. Here are the details:

Call it a modern family. Kourtney Kardashian and longtime boyfriend Scott Disick may have been dating since 2006 and have two young kids together, but that doesn’t mean the reality show couple has any intention of tying the knot.

“I think if it’s not broke, don’t fix it. You know what I mean?” Disick, 29, told Ryan Seacrest during an interview for upcoming special Ryan Seacrest With the Kardashians: An E! News Presentation.

The reality TV couple, who are parents to little Mason, 3, and Penelope, 8 months, have discussed the idea of marriage before, but according to Disick, it was actually Kardashian, 33, who wasn’t so sure she wanted to say “I do.”

“I would say we’re decently happy,” he said of their arrangement. “I feel like I used to want to get married more than she did, and then, being that she was always so not interested, I’ve decided not to be.”

The pair have come under scrutiny for their relationship, and even younger sister Kim, 32, has criticized Kourtney for her lack of affection toward Disick.

On an episode of “Kourtney & Kim Take Miami” last month, the mother-of-two countered that she sees her children as her “first priority.”

“You don’t even want alone time with Scott,” Kim said. “It’s weird.”

“For me, I like doing stuff all together as a family,” Kourtney responded.

“He’s gonna cheat on you and it’ll be your fault … You just don’t put in any effort,” younger sister Kim warned. “You’re going to lose him. No joke. you’re literally going to end up, like, alone.”

In a confessional, Kourtney later admitted that Kim’s words actually hit home. “Just hearing Kim say those words really just freaks me out,” she said. “Not that Scott would ever cheat on me, but I just really don’t want this for my relationship.”

[From Us Weekly]

Well, I think Kourtney has the right idea about not marrying Scott. I mean, if she insists upon sticking with him anyway — don’t marry the dude because it will probably only make him behave like even more of a jerk. Above all, she certainly doesn’t need to be taking any romantic advice from Kim, who doesn’t know the first thing about marriage (obviously, since the last one only lasted 73 days before Kim filed for divorce from Kris Humphries) or relationships. As for Kim’s notion that it’s a woman’s fault if a man cheats? Bitch, please.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet

Back in 2009-2010, there was some minor drama about Kourtney Kardashian’s baby-daddy drama. Kourtney gave birth to Mason Dash Disick in December 2009 after getting pregnant when she and Scott Disick were kind-of broken up earlier in the year. Shortly after Kourtney gave birth, a rapper/model named Premo Stallone (real name: Michael Girgenti) claimed that he had a brief affair with Kourtney around the same “baby-making” time-frame. They had met on a photo shoot, and they spent some time together and even slept together. First, Michael told his story to the tabloids with a giant “I might be the father” version of events, then he went to the tabloids to claim that he was demanding a paternity test and he wanted to know for sure if Mason was his. Then… nothing. Nothing has really happened with the story since 2010. I assumed the Kardashians had paid off Premo or that he was simply “taken care of”. But now he’s back!

In a new bombshell paternity claim, LA-based model Michael Girgenti, who worked with Kourtney Kardashian on a 944 magazine photo shoot in 2008, exclusively tells this week’s In Touch that he believes he is potentially Mason Disick’s biological father. In the new issue of In Touch, on newsstands now, Michael details the alleged encounter, which he claims was nine months before Mason’s birth.

“We started kissing, making out and touching each other. We were fooling around on the couch for a little while before I took her to the bedroom,” Michael tells In Touch of his alleged March 2009 fling with Kourtney, when she told him she was on a break from her boyfriend, Scott Disick. Then, he says, they headed to his room: “I slipped her clothes off. She helped me undress, and we fell into bed.”

Nine months later, on Dec. 14, 2009, Kourtney gave birth to baby Mason. She was back together with Scott —her longtime boyfriend and the publicly acknowledged father of her children, but Michael firmly believes the 3-year-old could be his son. “After he was born and I saw photos of him,” the 26-year-old tells In Touch, “I began to wonder.”

Michael claims the two communicated by BlackBerry Messenger, but says that after they were intimate during their third hangout at his Glendale, Calif., apartment, Kourtney went silent despite his attempts to reach her.

Kourtney acknowledges working with Michael at the shoot — but the rest, says her attorney, is fiction. “They did not exchange contact information. Since the August 20, 2008, on-set photo shoot, Kourtney never spoke with him, saw him nor met him again. Kourtney has never been alone with him, and Kourtney certainly has never physically/intimately been with Mr. Girgenti,” says her lawyer, who calls Michael’s suggestion that he could be Mason’s father “preposterous and an outrageous lie.”

But Michael insists it all happened and first went public after Mason’s birth, hoping Kourtney would agree to a DNA test for Mason. Now he’s speaking out again in hopes it will “finally push them into taking the DNA test,” says the Chicago native, who says he just wants the truth. “I would definitely want to acknowledge Mason if he’s my kid,” Michael says. “He deserves to know his real father.”

[From In Touch Weekly]

It’s interesting, right? Personally, I wouldn’t doubt that Kourtney was sleeping with other men around the same time frame (like mother, like daughter), and it’s possible that Kourtney really doesn’t know. Or that she simply hopes that Scott is truly the father, which… hey, it’s a more than solid possibility. I think Scott really loves Mason and from what I’ve seen, Scott loves being a dad (even if Scott is a douche to Kourtney). Anyway, I doubt anything will come of this, but I was just happy that Premo Stallone is still around.

Cover courtesy of In Touch Weekly. Additional photos by Fame/Flynet and WENN.

One of my least favorite things in the world is featured on the new Us Weekly cover. One of my least favorite things? The monetizing/celebration/famewhoring of post-baby weight loss. Don’t get me wrong, I know weight loss is a big deal (and big money for celebrities), and I get that everyone wants to see photos of a postpartum celebrity to see how quickly or slowly they’re losing their baby weight. But do we really need covers like this? With a photo of Kourtney Kardashian’s bump compared to her new, post-baby body? Here’s a huge SPOILER for her 44-pound weight loss: she had a baby, and then she breastfed. Shock!

Six months after the birth of her second child, E! reality star Kourtney Kardashian is back in a bikini — and proudly showing off her 44-pound weight loss in a series of unretouched pictures for Us Weekly!

Posing poolside in Miami Dec. 13, the Kourtney and Kim & Take Miami star shared her diet and fitness secrets in a full-length interview with West Coast Bureau Chief Rebecca Bienstock.

“It was harder to lose weight the second time around,” admitted Kardashian, mom to son Mason, 3, and daughter Penelope, 6 months (with partner Scott Disick, 29). “I gained 45 pounds with Penelope.”

Now a lean 106 pounds, the 5-foot star credits pro Tracy Anderson’s 90-minute dance-focused workouts and small portion sizes for helping her slim down in record time. “This time, the focus is really on being a mom and being present, knowing my priorities,” Kardashian, 33, told Us.

For details on how Kardashian got her post-baby body back — and her thoughts on marriage and having a third child — pick up the new issue of Us Weekly, on stands Friday!

[From Us Weekly]

I don’t think you should count your weight loss from your highest pregnancy weight. Because the first 8 pounds of “weight loss” will be the baby, right? If you’re going to start weighing yourself and setting a post-baby goal weight, why don’t you start with your weight six to eight weeks after giving birth? Of course, I have no sense of why any of this is important – I don’t weigh myself. Because I am more than a f—king number (and because I know myself, and if I start weighing myself I will obsess about it and get really neurotic, so why go down that rabbit hole?). Anyway, this is just one of the many things I’m grumbling about today, don’t mind me. Last point: I can’t believe Kourtney is doing Tracy Anderson’s program! Ugh.

Here’s Kourtney in early December:

Photos courtesy of WENN, cover courtesy of Us Weekly.

A few years ago, I idly remarked that when the end came for the Kardashians, it would come by Scott Disick’s hand. I think I said something about Scott going crazy one day and in the end, he would be arrested while hauling a truck full of Kardashian bodies to some dump site (insert Kim joke). Over the past year or so, I have to say… Scott has improved slightly. He doesn’t seem so American Psycho these days, and sometimes I actually think Scott might be more committed to making his relationship with Kourtney work, and that SHE is the one causing most of the problems/drama. It seemed kind of obvious to me why Kourt and Scott never married – because they both thought they could (eventually) do better. But maybe becoming parents to Mason and Penelope changed things. Because now it’s looking more and more like Scott and Kourtney are engaged. Per Kris Jenner’s direct order, of course.

After having two of his children, Scott Disick is finally going to make Kourtney Kardashian an honest woman!

The reality stars, who have been together for five years, got engaged in Paris last week, reports Star magazine, and RadarOnline.com has the details.

“We’re all so thrilled they’ve finally decided to get engaged,” Scott’s aunt, Laurie Disick dished to Star. “We’re all so fond of Kourtney, and we wish them a long, happy marriage.”

RadarOnline.com exclusively reported that Scott was shopping for engagement rings at Levinson Jewelers in Fort Lauderdale in late October. “Scott was most definitely shopping for engagement rings,” an onlooker exclusively told Radar, “and all of them were large!”

Star reports that Scott was with Kourtney in Paris filming scenes for their reality show and thought that the romantic backdrop would be the perfect place to pop the question.

“Scott’s actually been planning to propose for a while,” an insider says, “but he just wasn’t sure when the moment would be right.”

So when the couple and their two children, Mason, 2, and Penelope, went to Paris to film Keeping Up With The Kardashians, Scott knew it was the perfect time and place to do it.

“She absolutely adores Paris, so even though they were doing double-duty there by filming scenes for Keeping Up With The Kardashians, just being in the City of Light helped put Kourtney in the right frame of mind when Scott made his move.”

After the couple “locked their love” by linking a padlock on the famous Pont des Arts Bridge and threw the key into the Seine river, Scott tried to find a quiet moment alone.

“Scott and Kourtney added a lock of their own, and then they explained to Mason what true love means. It was an intensely touching and romantic moment, and Scott got swept up in it. He waiting a bit until he and Kourtney had a moment to themselves, then he took her hand and told her that he knows he’s made mistakes in the past but that he’s learned from them. He then vowed that he would never hurt her again — and quietly asked Kourtney to marry him,” the insider spilled. “She was so overjoyed, she eagerly said yes!”

According to the mag, Kourtney and Scott’s televised wedding will rival sister Kim‘s wedding to Kris Humphries, and is expected to earn the couple $20 million in endorsement deals.

[From Hollywood Life & Radar]

Yeah, the whole thing comes from Star Magazine – this “engagement news!” is Star’s cover story this week. Even though I think the engagement is probably going down soon, I’m going to wait to call this a “confirmation” until Us Weekly reports it. Us Weekly is Kourtney’s tabloid of choice – she gave Us Weekly her second pregnancy confirmation, and they bought Penelope’s first photos.

Another reason why I think Kourt and Scott are engaged or will be soon: because momager Kris Jenner wants a “nice” Kardashian wedding story for the media to focus on while Kim is stuck in neverending divorce proceedings. First Kourt gets married off, then Kris is angling for a Kim-Kanye wedding by mid to late 2013. Trust me.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

I’ve mentioned before that my mom watches the Kardashian shows, right? Well, she’s started to really like Scott Disick. Apparently, the Kardashian writers are making an effort to make Scott seem like less of a “villain” and more like a loving family man. I’m not sure if he pulls it off. Anyway, while Kim Kardashian’s divorce from Kris Humphries is dragging on endlessly, thus forcing Kim’s pimp mother to wait on the giant “KIM & KANYE WEDDING!” plans, Kris Jenner is digging up an old chestnut. Apparently, the next big Kardashian wedding is going to be Scott and Kourtney. And they kind of hate each other so they’re just doing it for the money:

Another Kardashian TV wedding? In Touch has exclusively learned that longtime couple Kourtney Kardashain and Scott Disick “are planning to get engaged when they tape the end of the season of Kourtney & Kim Take Miami in December,” a friend of the family confirms in the new issue of In Touch, on newsstands now.

And Scott is already shopping for a ring. “He was at Levinson Jewelers in Fort Lauderdale on Oct. 25,” says an eyewitness, noting that the cameras were rolling. “He was looking at really big, expensive diamond rings.”

Sources reveal to In Touch that they’ve already begun the planning and she’s even given the green-light to televise their nuptials.

“She and Scott have met with a wedding planner,” another friend confirms to In Touch. “And they’ve narrowed down the date — the wedding is scheduled to take place after Christmas but before Easter.”

But friends fear that if they marry, it may not be for the right reasons.

“It’s definitely just for TV ratings,” says an insider close to the couple. (A rep denies the wedding is happening.) “Kourtney is getting caught up in the show, and he, of course, just wants the payday. Sadly, she’s flirting with disaster — and everyone knows it.”

As In Touch previously reported, Scott has left Kourtney and their two children for all-night partying and drunken binges at clubs in Las Vegas and New York multiple times in recent months.

[From In Touch Weekly]

The problem with the “it’s just for ratings/money” explanation is that Kourtney and Scott aren’t the big names of the Kardashian Empire. No one really gives a crap about them, if we’re being honest. Sure, we cared a little bit about Kourtney during her two pregnancies, but now that the baby’s out, do we really give a crap? No. Not really. That being said, I do think most people would enjoy seeing photos, and the trademarked Kardashian Spectacle. I would look at photos of Kourtney in a wedding dress. I would “aw” at photos of Mason as the ring bearer. And I would laugh at the horrendous, trashy-looking bridesmaids dresses that Kourtney would choose for her sisters. So… maybe it’s not the worst idea, I guess.

Here are some photos of Scott dressed up as Patrick Bateman from American Psycho. Well, at least he gets the “joke” I guess.

Photos courtesy of WENN, cover courtesy of In Touch.

I just read Us Weekly’s full cover story with Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick, and I came away from it… kind of emotional. Unexpected, right? But Kourtney and Scott both came across really well. Surprisingly well. I’m just going to do some highlights from the piece, because I know you don’t really care THAT much:

*Penelope weighed 7 pounds, 14 ounces at birth. Kourtney is really funny as she describes how everyone was making her nervous about going into labor: “I was trying to coordinate my birth with their schedules. Scott and I went on a walk and I started having contractions.”

*The delivery was super-quick and easy. Scott says, “Her delivery was quick. In the months before she gave birth, we would pray that she’d have a good one, and she did. Kourtney’s mother was supersupportive. It was cute to see her hold Kourtney’s hand and get her through it.”

*Kourtney was only at the hospital for THREE HOURS! She says: “We didn’t stay overnight at the hospital – I was only in the hospital for about three hours total.”

*Kourtney pulled Penelope out, just like she pulled Mason out.

*They haven’t decided if they’ll show this birth on TV. But Scott taped footage, and some other people were recording too.

*Penelope has “Scott’s cleft chin, she skin tone is lighter than Mason’s. But she has the Kardashian lashes!” Penelope also has a “little raspy voice.”

*Mason is “in love” with his baby sister. Scott says, “He wanted to smell her and give her a kiss on the head and touch her nose and touch her ears.”

*Khloe is “the baby-whisperer” according to Kourt. Khloe is really good with her niece. Which is so sad, because Khloe wants a baby so badly.

*Scott and Kourtney still aren’t sleeping in the same room. Kourtney sleeps with the newborn, Scott sleeps in the guest room or with Mason.

*Scott hasn’t changed Penelope’s diapers yet, but he has a good reason: “My son is almost 3, and I don’t mind changing his diapers. I’m just not comfortable doing it when the baby is that small. One wrong move and you could break the child’s bone. At least my son can tell me, ‘Dad, you’re doing it wrong.’ With a little baby, it’s scary.”

*Scott’s “push present” to Kourtney: “He gave me diamond stud earrings. I’ve wanted them for so long.”

[From Us Weekly, print edition]

There’s even more stuff in there, like Kourtney saying she doesn’t pay attention to the rumors that Scott parties too much, and Scott also says (in a nicer way) that Kourt turned into a massive, moody bitch during this pregnancy, but now that she gave birth, she’s back to normal. They end it by agreeing that neither of them is thinking about getting married at this point, and that what they have going on is working for them. I’ll admit it – this was actually a really good read! Shocking.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Kourtney Kardashian gave away (sold?) the first baby photos of her daughter Penelope to Us Weekly. It’s a step up from Life & Style, who got the first photos of Mason (Dixon) Disick two years ago. I bet Kourtney got a nice check from Us Weekly, but it was probably in the low six-figures, don’t you think? Kourtney gave birth to Penelope Scotland Disick on July 8 – which makes this baby one month old. Granted, I know nothing about babies, but is it just me or is this a big one-month-old? Maybe it looks that way because Kourtney is so petite. Also: it’s interesting that Scott didn’t make the cover, right?

And Penelope makes four!

Kourtney Kardashian introduces adorable daughter Penelope Scotland Disick — — with pages of exclusive photos — in the new issue of Us Weekly, out now.

Born July 8 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles and weighing 7 pounds, 14 ounces, Penelope joins big brother Mason, Kardashian’s first child with Scott Disick, her boyfriend of six years.

Gushes the ecstatic second-time mom (who shares her new Us Weekly cover with sleepy Penelope and a beaming Mason): “Nothing could prepare me for how hard I fell in love with her.”

In the new issue, the reality star, 33, and Disick, 29, open up to Us about Penelope’s delivery (with the entire Kardashian-Jenner family in tow!), how Mason is adjusting to big-brotherhood, Kourtney’s push present, why Disick’s afraid to change Penelope’s diaper and much more!

[From Us Weekly]

I can’t wait to find out about Kourtney’s push present. What do you think Scott gave her? A gift certificate for ten bikini waxes? No, I jest. I keep hearing that Scott really has “changed” and he’s a better man these days. And I can’t reiterate enough how happy I am that Kourtney and Scott have ended the cycle of “K” names, and that they didn’t start their own trend of “M” names either.

Here are some photos of Scott and Mason in Miami over the weekend. Mason is so friggin’ cute. I like that he’s all “I’m going to walk everywhere by myself.”

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

It’s baby time! I’ve been expecting this for a while – all of the knocked up celebrity women are going to be giving birth, all within a few days/weeks of each other. Over the weekend, it was Sienna Miller and now Kourtney Kardashian. You should keep your eye on Drew Barrymore too – I suspect she’ll be giving birth shortly. Anyway, Kourtney and Scott Disick welcomed their second child together on Sunday, according to E! News. It was a little girl, and they named her Penelope Scotland Disick. Hm.

Look out, world: there’s an adorable new Kardashian to keep up with now! Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick have welcomed their second child—and first daughter—E! News has exclusively learned.

The baby girl was born early Sunday in Los Angeles at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and joins big brother Mason in the ever-expanding Kardashian-Disick household. So how did the birth go down? And, most importantly, what’s the cutie pie’s name?

Let’s say hello to Penelope Scotland Disick.

“Scott and I are overjoyed to welcome our precious angel Penelope Scotland Disick into our lives. We are forever blessed. Mommy and baby are resting comfortably,” Kourtney tells E! News.

The 33-year-old E! star had an all-natural birth, and her new mini-me tipped the scales at 7 pounds, 14 ounces.

“It was a great. She had an easy delivery,” matriarch Kris Jenner tells us. “[Penelope] is so cute. She looks just like Mason. She’s so beautiful. We are so happy.”

As it happens, this has been one highly anticipated birth (complete with a headline-grabbing false alarm), and not just among the fans. Kourtney and Scott announced the news of the impending stork delivery last November, and revealed that they were expecting their first daughter in February of this year (son Mason turned the big 0-2 in December).

In May, the family—along with Kim Kardashian’s beau, Kanye West—celebrated the baby-to-be with a femme-fueled, pink-themed baby shower. As for the million-dollar question: as Mason’s birth was must-see TV, are the proud new parents going to once again share with fans the miracle of life?

“I don’t know,” Kourtney said on the Tonight Show a few weeks ago. “We’re gonna film it again ourselves, and honestly, my experience last time was so peaceful and calm and everything you don’t see in the movies. And I really wanted to share that with people so they knew it doesn’t have to be a crazy screaming session.”

This time around, we’ll have to wait and see. While Kourtney said she and Scott planned on filming the birth, they would decide after the fact if they were going to go public with the footage. And something tells us that’s not their biggest priority at the moment.

[From E! News]

Well, congrats. I don’t hate the name Penelope at all. As for “Scotland” – eh. It’s just a middle name, and I guess it was just to have “Scott” somewhere in there. Penelope Disick? Penny Disick? That’s kind of cute. My mom – who watches the Kardashian shows – says that Scott has changed for the better over the past year, and that Kourtney has turned into an even bigger a—hole (“like her mother,” my mom says). I have to admit, I’m kind of surprised that Scott has stuck around and I’m kind of surprised that Kourtney hasn’t kicked him to the curb by now. And now there’s another Kardashian girl in the mix! Mother of God.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

I don’t even have an answer for that question in the headline, it’s just that the Kardashians make such a versatile punchline. So Kim and Kourtney got an invite to an Oscar viewing party to benefit the Elton John Foundation. They went together, and they shared some makeup tips ahead of time, like how to shade your forehead dark orange and use white highlighting foundation under your eyes paired with nude lips. The effect is very “blow up doll,” but maybe that’s just how their faces permanently look now. (If you keep injecting that stuff into your face, it will freeze like that honey.) Remember when Kim opined about the horrors of improperly matched foundation color? She said that she hates it “when women wear the wrong foundation color. It might be the worst thing on the planet when they wear their makeup too light.” So she’s trying to balance it out with multiple shades of orange. She probably thinks she looks good, since her sister looks like that.

Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant, so maybe she gets a pass for this “ghost costume” sheet of a dress with a gold neckline. She was going for Grecian, and it sort-of works. I’m just wondering why her dress doesn’t have orange smears all over it. Kourtney and Kim must shellac themselves thoroughly. (Update: Kourtney’s dress is the Penelope Gown by Raoul.)

Kim’s dress isn’t bad, for her. The pattern close up is bizarre, but the fit is flattering and the cut outs along the skirt are kind of cool. Look at how fake baked her arms are though! She looks like an oompa loompa.

Oh Kardashians, you’re going to be fueling punch lines for a while longer now. Especially when you look like this.

photo credit: FameFlynet and WENN.com