Page 1 of 3123


Oct 11
'10
Kim Kardashian is trying to convince us that Reggie Bush is still interested

BEVERLY HILLS, CA - FEBRUARY 08:  Professional football player Reggie Bush (L) and TV personality Kim Kardashian attend Russell Simmons' 'Salute to Grammy Award Nominees' celebration at a private mansion on February 8, 2009 in Beverly Hills, California.  (Photo by David Livingston/Getty Images)

Radar has a fascinating piece about how Reggie Bush is still trying to bone Kim Kardashian. Pardon me, did I say “bone”? I mean, “Kim wants people to think Reggie is still in love with her because she’s still not over him.” Kim and Reggie broke up several months ago amidst rumors that he was already lining up a number of jump-offs. Kim tried to pull the relationship together, clinging to Reggie, but in the end, I feel pretty strongly that he dumped her. I think she wanted to marry him, and I think he wanted to hook up with all the randoms he wanted. Since their breakup, I’ve noticed that every now and then, there is a random (planted) report about how Reggie just can’t wait to get back with Kim, how he’s calling her and begging her to come back. These reports always sound like they came from Kim’s people. In any case, I’m not buying a potential reunion, but it is interesting to think that Kim is still not over Reggie:

Reggie Bush is back keeping up with Kim Kardashian. The on-again, off-again couple is taking the first steps toward possibly rekindling their romance, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned.

“Kim and Reggie are back talking after their split,” a source close to Kim told RadarOnline.com. “There has been more communication of late than there has since she they ended their relationship in March.”

Kim’s recent split from Dallas Cowboy Miles Austin and Reggie’s broken leg have conspired to allow the pair to to work on rebuilding a friendship, according to our insider.
The reunion comes as Kim prepares to celebrate her 30th birthday on October 21 – a milestone those close to Kim suggest she would like to share with Reggie.

While Reggie has been rumored to be romancing budding singer Mayra Veronica, the injured New Orleans Saints’ star hasn’t ruled out the possibility of giving Kim another go.

In late May, 25-year-old Reggie himself admitted that Kim reunion is possible. Asked about whether or not a reconciliation might occur, he told E! News at the Cedars Sinai Sports Spectacular, “Yeah, anything’s possible. We’ve always been on good terms, always. No matter what happens.”

Not soon after that event, Kim and Reggie crossed paths at the wedding of Reggie’s teammate Bobby McCray, who tied the knot with Khadijah Haqq. Khadija’s best friend Khloe Kardashian was in the bridal party.

Now one source told RadarOnline.com: “Kim and Reggie have realized they share a common bond and at this time, Kim is providing Reggie all the support he can get as he recovered from the broken fibula in his right leg.”

Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush began dating in April 2007 after meeting at the ESPY Awards. They called off their romance in July 2009 only to reconcile in October the same year, before splitting against in March, this year.

Only time will tell if the reconciliation will translate to Kim and Reggie deciding to give their on-and-off-again romance another chance.

[From Radar]

Eh. I think Kim still wants to get married and I think Reggie still doesn’t want to. Or he just doesn’t want to marry Kim. Rumors around their breakup also involved his family not being thrilled with the idea of Reggie “settling down” with a Kat-Face with a sex tape. Who knows?

Speaking of Kim being slightly desperate, Page Six’s sources are now claiming that Kim is NOT dating that dude Michael Copon, and that she’s still “searching for the one.” Eh.

New Orleans Saints running back Reggie Bush and his girlfriend Kim Kardashian walk the red carpet at the Moves Magazine Super Bowl XLIII party in Tampa, Florida, on January 28, 2009. (UPI Photo/Roger L. Wollenberg) Photo via Newscom Photo via Newscom

LAS VEGAS - JANUARY 26:  Television personality Kim Kardashian (L) and NFL player Reggie Bush appear as Kardashian hosts a night at Prive Las Vegas inside the Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino January 26, 2008 in Las Vegas, Nevada.  (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images for Prive)

28242, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - Sunday February 15 2009. Has Kim been taking fashion tips from Reggie's football field? Wearing a mega shoulder padded eighties style jacket, Kim Kardashian and boyfriend Reggie Bush attend a fashion show in NYC. The happy couple were at the Y-3 Fall/Winter 09/10 catwalk show, held as part of New York fashion week. Photograph: © Darla Khazei, PacificCoastNews.com ****** UK OFFICE: 131 557 7760/7761/7762 US OFFICE: 1 310 261 9676

Posted in Kimberly Kardashian, Reggie Bush

Written by Kaiser         27 Comments »
Mar 3
'10
Kardashians sisters are “humiliated” by Scott “STD” Disick

image002
*Sidenote: the “mystery cellulite” is Kesha!* Whoops… it’s Rihanna, my bad.

Star Magazine and In Touch Weekly seem to have very similar cover stories this week, both about how the Kardashian sisters have “toxic love” with their men, because their men are “humiliating!” them. My favorite is the Star Magazine cover, just because I’m loving the insets of the men. Khloe’s husband Lamar gets the note: “Divorce!” Scott Disick gets “Duped!” and Reggie Bush gets “Dumped!”. In Touch looks pretty good too – the main gist of their story seems to be that Scott Disick is a douche. Oh, and his initials are STD. Which… I mean… his parents are insane.

“Scott had a couple of nicknames in high school. One was Number One Scum, and the other was STD,” Scott’s former classmate Jason Green tells In Touch.

Kourtney Kardashian’s boyfriend, Scott Disick, tries to portray himself as a loving, responsible dad who’s just misunderstood.

“I can’t really pinpoint why people want to push me as the bad guy,” he tells In Touch. “But that’s a part of life — people enjoy putting other people down.”

Sadly, there seems to be a lot more basis than that for Scott’s bad reputation. Long before he gained fame on Keeping Up With the Kardashians, Scott was known as a hard partier, a serial cheater and, as one high school acquaintance puts it, “a tool.”

And as more and more information surfaces about Scott’s shady past, Kourtney wonders how long she’ll be able to put up with him. Jason Green, one of Scott’s former classmates from Long Island, N.Y.’s Ross School, agrees that Scott was bad news in high school.

“There were just as many rumors about him then as there are now,” Jason tells In Touch. “Scott had a couple of nicknames in high school. One was Number One Scum, and the other was STD.”

A lot of guys might be embarrassed to have the initials “STD,” but Scott thought they enhanced his reputation as a ladies’ man! According to Jason, Scott was so proud to have the same initials as “sexually transmitted disease” that “he wore dog tags with ‘STD’ printed on them.” Classy!

[From In Touch Weekly]

Seriously, what’s worse? Having the initials STD or being proud of those initials? Oh, Lord. And you know Scott is the kind of guy to get everything monogrammed too. Now I really feel for Kourtney. She doesn’t seem like a horrible person, and she deserves so much better than Scott. Where’s Premo Stallion when you need him?

starmagkardashian

Star courtesy of CoverAwards. In Touch Weekly cover courtesy of ITW online.

Posted in Khloe Kardashian, Kimberly Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Scott Disick

Written by Kaiser         41 Comments »
Sep 7
'09
Kourtney Kardashian’s baby-daddy Scott Disick has a “man-shower” with K-Fed

90906m6_kardashian_b-gr_09
After the initial announcement of her pregnancy, Kourtney Kardashian went on a media binge like no other. She gave “exclusive” interviews to every major outlet, tabloid and television show. We heard about how Kourtney forgot her birth control, how she considered abortion, that she’s going to breastfeed with implants, and that she’s going to use this pregnancy to launch herself in a big way (shocking). And those were just some of the bigger stories. For about a week, People and Us Weekly was giving us hourly updates on her food intake, and her bowel movements.

Of course, along with that kind of crap coverage, we also got some reports about the lingering worries that baby-daddy Scott Disick is still pretty much a douchey womanizer. The latest report just solidifies that image to a ridiculous point – Scott Disick threw himself a “man-shower” (a baby shower for men). This “man-shower” was held in Miami. With Kevin Federline. K-Fed even gave Scott “some cute advice about being a father.” Oh. My. Gawd.

While Kim Kardashian plans sister Kourtney’s baby shower, the Kourtney & Khloe Take Miami star’s boyfriend, Scott Disick, had his own daddy-to-be celebration of sorts this week in Miami during an evening of dining and clubbing Kourtney jokingly dubs a “man-shower.”

On Wednesday, while Kardashian, 30, and Disick, 26, were in Miami – where she and her famous sisters own the store Dash – the on-again couple attended a dinner at the Fontainebleau hotel’s steakhouse Gotham Steak with Kevin Federline, 31, his girlfriend Victoria Prince, musician Cisco Adler and rapper Shwayze.

Afterwards, Disick and Federline headed to the hotel’s nightclub LIV to watch Adler and Shwayze perform.

“We were joking that it was Scott’s ‘man shower,’ like his version of a baby shower,” Kardashian tells PEOPLE. “Guys get excited too about having a baby, so they should do something too. One of our friends started calling it a ‘man shower,’ but I was like, ‘Guys don’t have tea and open presents!’ But for them, dinner and then going to a nightclub is a ‘man shower.’ They thought it was funny.”

As for the male bonding, Kardashian says Federline gave her beau “some cute advice about being a father, he was really sweet, saying how Scott’s life will change.”

Kardashian says that evening is where the “man shower” festivities will likely stop. “That was it,” she says. “That’s as far as guys will ever plan unless they need an excuse to go out! I had no desire to go. I was relaxing, chilling. If they want to go have a ‘man shower’ in Miami, then go ahead!”

And did the boys behave? “Yes,” she says. “And it’s downstairs, so if I needed anything, it’s close. I totally chilled.”

The previous night, Federline and Prince visited The Gansevoort South hotel’s Louis Bar Lounge, where they shared a table with Disick and danced to tracks by Prince, The Rolling Stones, Jay-Z and The Ting Tings.

Federline was in Miami co-parenting his kids with ex-wife Britney Spears, who performed a sold-out show at American Airlines Arena on Wednesday night.

[From People]

Is this really so terrible? Not really. It’s just B-List, sad and funny. Here’s the thing – I don’t even think K-Fed is that terrible a father. I used to think he was awful, but I still have some vaguely pleasant recollections about how well he behaved during Britney’s crazy period.

I also wanted to point out something else I’ve noticed since Kourtney made her pregnancy announcement – Kim and Khloe seem to be out of sorts, don’t they? I mean, Khloe is used to not getting any attention, since people really, really don’t care about her, but Kim is used to be the Kardashian that gets all of the press, and she’s been doing anything she can to stay in the press. Kim even told the paparazzi that she “wants a baby too!” Of course you do, honey. Baby = attention. Meanwhile, it seems Khloe is trying something new – a high-profile relationship with LA Lakers’ forward Lamar Odom. They’ve been spotted all over LA, and Odom told Us Weekly, “Khloe is smart and beautiful and that is very hard to find.” What’s that again? Anyway… people still don’t care about her, do they? Well, I’m happy for her. Odom is so huge, he makes Khloe look petite.

Kourteney Kardashian and Scott Disick are shown on the beach in Miami on 9/6/09. Credit: KADENA PIX/bauergriffinonline.com. Khloe Kardashian and Lamar Odom are shown out with Khloe’s mom, Kris Jenner, on 9/5/09. Credit: PER/Fame Pictures

Posted in Babies, Kevin Federline, Khloe Kardashian, Kimberly Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Scott Disick

Written by Kaiser         9 Comments »
Aug 21
'09
Kourtney Kardashian thinks pregnancy will “raise her profile”

fp_3335302_kardashian_kourtney_mia_072809

Star Magazine has an interesting article about the drama surrounding Kourtney Kardashian’s pregnancy. Much of it reads like yesterday’s report from the Enquirer – that Scott Disick is a cheater and a wanker, and that Kourtney’s family and friends don’t think much of him. Most of this piece is a confirmation of that, but there is some new information. Apparently, Kim Kardashian was really pissed that Scott didn’t drop to his knee and propose immediately when he learned of Kourtney’s pregnancy. Also – Kim read Scott the riot act about his immaturity. The way Star makes it sound, it’s as if they came thisclose to referring to it as a “man-to-man chat”. Kim has also been trying to act like Scott’s official chaperon, although I don’t know how she’s managing to watch Scott while she’s allegedly reconnecting with Reggie Bush.

The most interesting part, to me, was about how Kourtney thinks her pregnancy is her ticket to fame. Kourtney thinks the baby will “raise her profile” and “the timing is perfect” to coincide with the promotion of her new show. She also has dreams of doing a maternity line:

“[The Kardashians] are all super concerned because Kourtney and Scott have never had a solid relationship,” an insider tells Star. “He’s a cheater, and he’s really hurt her in the past.”

Kourtney, 30, called off their 10-month engagement in February because of Scott’s wandering eye. “He was openly flirting – probably more – with other women,” a source said at the time. But by March, they were back on. Then Kourtney forgot to take her birth control pills, and a baby was on the way.

“Kim and the rest of the Kardashians are really rallying around Kourtney,” a source says. “Thye want to make sure she has all the love and support she needs.” Because she isn’t getting it from Scott.

Kourtney admitted: “Scott’s had moments when he’s really scared.”

“Kim pulled him aside for a long lecture,” an insider reveals. “She told him that he needs to stop being so immature and noncommittal.” Kim couldn’t believe that Scott didn’t propose as soon as he heard the news.

But for Kourtney, the ring really isn’t an issue. “She’s got what she wants,” says a source. “Attention!”

The mom-to-be seems more concerned with making headlines than playing house. “She thinks the pregnancy will be great for raising her profile,” says a source.

Indeed, the publicity is perfectly timed to coincide with the start of her new show, Kourtney & Khloe Take Miami. Next, she plans to open a children’s clothing store in LA. And she even wants to design her own maternity line! “She wants to do something like Nicole Richie did for A Pea in the Pod,” one source explains.

While Kourtney travels to promote her show, Kim is keeping an eye on the father-to-be, even chaperoning Scott to an event on August 12. “She didn’t let him out of her sight all night!” a source tells Star.

“Kourtney wants Scott in her life, but she’s not going to put up with any drama,” says a source. “She’ll raise the child alone if it comes to that.”

[From Star Magazine, print edition, August 31 2009]

I don’t find any of this hard to believe in the least. Kourtney has been looking to break out and get more attention for a while now – Khloe too, for that matter. They’ve been eclipsed by Kim’s badonkadonk long enough! And Kourtney’s plan to get more attention is working! People Magazine is now doing daily updates on Kourtney, all with “exclusive” interviews. Today’s story is “I Wish My Dad Was Alive”. I have no doubt that Kourtney does miss her father, but I’m starting to find the coverage, the interviews, and the updates a little… what’s the word?… famewhorish. I’m already over it. That was quick!

Here’s Kourtney leaving Madeo restaurant in Beverly Hills on July 28th. Images thanks to Fame Pictures .

Posted in Infidelity, Kimberly Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Pregnant, Scott Disick

Written by Kaiser         37 Comments »
Apr 21
'09
Kim Kardashian gets offended that US Weekly calls her ‘fuller figured’

dancing with stars 150409
US Weekly had a small fashion article in their latest issue which happened to mention that clothing store Forever 21 now has a plus-sized line, and that “Kim Kardashian is a fan.” It was implied that Kardashian was in the line’s target size range, which is listed from XL – 2XL, but nowhere in the article did it specifically mention that Kim was that size. On her blog, Kardashian said that she does like Forever 21 but is not a plus size, and that’s she’s a size 2, not a 2XL. What’s more is that she said it offended her to be called fuller figured:

I feel that this clipping from Us Magazine is a bit misleading, so I wanted to comment on it.

I am a huge fan of Forever 21 and I’m very happy they have expanded their line to include a plus-size range, but I am not in that size category and this article makes it sound like I am! I am a curvy girl and I love my curves, but curvy and plus-sized are two very different things. I work really hard to maintain my curves while staying slim and healthy, so to be classed as a “fuller-figured woman” of extra large proportions is a little offensive.

For the record, I am a size 2, not 2XL.

[From Kim Kardashian's blog]

Kardashian recently lost weight through diet and exercise, and partially in preparation for the launch of her fitness DVD, “Fit in Your Jeans by Friday.” The 5’2″ reality star said she went from a size 6 to a size 2. You can see how she would take offense at being called “fuller figured,” because she wasn’t even an XL before she lost weight. You can also imagine how Kim’s comments would be construed as insensitive toward women who do wear larger sizes though. People are trashing Kim in the comments on her blog, saying that her comments show how small-minded and self-obsessed she is:

Your comments made you sound incredibly shallow and superficial. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being plus sized or 2XL! I am not + sized myself, but that was incredible insensitive of you to say. Had you been wiser, that wouldn’t have bothered you.

I can’t believe that you really took time out of your day to scan and post this article. Next time you read things, make sure you’re fully understanding it. I feel badly because not only did you hurt my feelings, but many of your fans’ feelings.

[Comment on Kim Kardashian's blog by AngelaMarie]

Many are saying that the article never said Kardashian was in that size range and by responding in that way she’s hurt people that used to look up to her:

The article didn’t even say she was plus size but even if it did there’s a tactful way of addressing the issue without putting others down

[Comment from nikkisws]

kim, i love you and i think you’re a great role model. however, they didn’t call you plus sized. I’m so proud of my body and i thought you were someone to look up to, saying to always be confident. you’ve unintentionally offended some of your fans.

[Comment from NWord]

Many are focusing on Kim’s statement that she finds it offensive “to be classed as a ‘fuller-figured woman’ of extra large proportions” as particularly insensitive. It was just in March that she said “I’m proud of my body and my curves.” Maybe she’ll issue a half-apology statement to the effect of “not that there’s anything wrong with that,” but I doubt she’ll grasp how obnoxious she was. This is the woman who posted photos of the pet chimp her family rented just a week after the incident in which a chimpanzee mauled a woman in Connecticut. She just doesn’t get it.

Kim Kardashian is shown out on 4/14/09. Credit: WENN.com
dancing with stars 150409

Posted in Kimberly Kardashian

Written by Celebitchy         28 Comments »
Feb 26
'09
Kim Kardashian sorry for chimp adoption, says it was just rented for week

kardashian1
Kim Kardashian outraged a lot of people when she stupidly posted photos on her blog last week of a three year old chimpanzee she said her family adopted. All she basically said about it was “We got a Monkey!!” [sic] and what amounted to “isn’t she cute?” Kardashian posted the entry which made it seem as if her family had a new, permanent, less materialistic member on February 20, a full four days after the high profile chimp mauling incident in Connecticut. Now Kardashian is backtracking, and claims that the young chimp was “rented” for just one week and that the footage will be featured on her family’s reality show, “Keeping Up With The Kardashians.” She says she didn’t mean to insult anyone by making it seem as if they were getting the chimp right after the whole world learned how dangerous it could be, and says she “cried” when she heard the news about how a woman was put in critical condition when by a longterm family pet mauled her. Did Kardashian just forget seeing that on the news or did she think it wasn’t relevant to her own adoption of a chimp, since she had a “monkey” and that’s different, right?

Kim Kardashian has issued an apology for posting photos of her new chimp Suzy on her Web site the same week a simian mauled a Connecticut woman.

“I understand my timing was not appropriate and it was insensitive of me, so I want to explain,” she blogs. “The pictures I posted are from six months ago when we were filming season three of Keeping Up With the Kardashians. I had held onto these pictures for months and preset them to run the month before my show was going to air, to give you guys exclusive glimpses into season three.

Look back at Kim Kardashian’s best booty shots

“My mom has been begging Kourtney, Khloe and I to settle down and have kids, so we thought it would be funny to rent a baby chimpanzee for a week and leave her with my mom! We don’t still have Suzy, she was just rented for a week! You guys will see what happens this season with Suzy!

“What happened to the woman that was attacked by the chimpanzee was devastating!” Kardashian says of 55-year-old Charla Nash, who was attacked last week and remains under sedation at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio (police shot and killed the chimp).

Adds Kardashian, “My mom and I saw it on the news and heard the 911 calls and we both cried!”

Before signing off, she writes, “Our family is praying for everyone involved in that traumatizing attack. In no way did I mean to insult or offend anyone by posting these pictures.”

[From US Weekly]

If the producer want to do the right thing they will cut all the footage of the chimp and won’t air it. It’s irresponsible to make great ape adoption seem somehow cute or fun, especially after that woman in Stamford was nearly killed by one. As I mentioned before, it’s also cruel to the animals. Chimps are meant to be in the wild and shouldn’t become house pets. You know producers will never do that though, because they probably have some antic-filled footage and will make the chimp seem seem adorable. Maybe Kim Kardashian isn’t as much at fault in this instance as the show’s writers. It probably wasn’t even her family’s idea. Still, she should have known better than to publicize it at the worst time possible.

Posted in Kimberly Kardashian

Written by Celebitchy         20 Comments »
Aug 15
'08
Kim Kardashian admits she’s trying to lose her butt

Say it ain’t so! Kim Kardashian is trying to lose some of the junk in her trunk. Again. Kim is on a health kick and is working her ass off – literally – to shed some pounds. She’s also been looking a little more natural and wearing less makeup lately – and I think she looks a hell of a lot better for it. I never realized how pretty she is until she stopped caking on the eye makeup.

Though boyfriend Reggie Bush supposedly wanted Kim to trim down her cheeks a few months ago, it seems like she’s doing it for herself.

“I love that I’m curvy, but I’m on this major kick to try and lose weight, especially in my butt,” she tells Radar magazine. “I’m just so over it! When you’re posing on the red carpet and the paparazzi shout, ‘Turn around! Turn around!’ — it gets a little offensive.”

Kardashian, 27, denies rumors that she’s had butt implants. “I’ve seen magazines where plastic surgeons are saying, ‘If you want a butt like this it has to be fake,’” she says. “I’m just like, ‘Dude, have you ever seen an Armenian girl before?’” Earlier in the year, Paris Hilton blasted Kardashian’s booty, saying it “reminds me of cottage cheese inside a big trash bag.”

“Wasn’t that nasty?” Kardashian responds. “She called and apologized, and I accepted her apology. She said she was joking. I kind of laugh it off, like, ‘You know, I’ve never denied having cellulite.’ Everyone’s entitled to their own opinion. If she thinks my butt looks like that, I don’t really care,” she goes on. “At least I have a butt.”

[From US Weekly]

This story surprised me a little because Kim actually came off as nice and relatively classy – at least for a Kardashian. She handled the Paris thing with a lot of grace, without giving some bullshit response like, “She apologized and now we’re best friends.” She acknowledged it was rude despite the apology but didn’t dwell on it or start a feud.

As much crap as Kim gets for her butt, I think she looks great. But then again I don’t even have one. Some people have washboard abs; I have a washboard ass. I’ll gladly take whatever she doesn’t want.

Here’s Kim taking a break from her quest of getting into “movie-star-shape,” yesterday. Header of Kim from August 4th. Images thanks to Fame.

Posted in Kimberly Kardashian, Weight

Written by JayBird         34 Comments »
Jul 25
'08
Shanna Moakler and Kim Kardashian in public bitch fight


Shanna Moakler and Kim Kardashian are involved in a high school level feud over whether Kim had an affair with Travis Barker, Shanna’s on-off-on-probably-off ex-husband. It gives me a headache just to read the drivel they’re hurling back and forth, but Kardashian’s response seems to make the most sense and sum up the issue best: Moakler accused Kardashian of having an affair with Barker, which would mean she cheated on her boyfriend, Reggie Bush. Kardashian was a model for Barker’s clothing line and says their relationship was purely professional. Plus, she says Travis isn’t her type anyway. Here’s Kardashian’s response to Moakler:

“I was a model for Famous Stars and Straps clothing line owned by Travis Barker. I ONLY had a professional relationship with Travis, in which he hired me to represent his brand for one season, which was a year and a half ago.”

[From The Dirty via TMZ]

While Kardashian’s response may be more measured and easier to follow, we shouldn’t pass up Moakler’s priceless interviews and MySpace entries, which make her sound clearly in the wrong, antagonistic and self-obsessed to boot. This isn’t the first rant against a perceived wrong Moakler has posted. She’s written nasty things about Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton in the past and even put up their contact information in a bid to get back at Lohan for claiming that Moakler hacked her myspace.

Apparently Kardashian and Moakler got into a fight at a barbeque in which Moakler accused Kardashian of sleeping with Barker and then proceeded to try and throw a drink at her – which landed on Kardashian’s foot instead. Moakler described the incident in an interview with TheDirty.com, and proceeded to call Kardashian fat:

Yea, we heard you had a little altercation with someone at Carmen Electra’s bbq. Is that true?

Shanna: Yea! I was at this bbq and I saw what I thought was a donkey posing on the stairs but much to my surprise, it was Kim Kardashian. No, wait, it was a donkey! She’s soooo f*cking fat! She’s 5′2″ and she’s like 140. She was wearing a sarong to cover her huge big ass! I like a nice ass but hers is not a nice ass!

[From The Dirty.com]

The way Moakler describes it, she then talked to Reggie Jackson, Kardashian’s boyfriend, and warned him that she had cheated on him. Moakler claims to have e-mails stolen from Kardashian’s sidekick that the were sent to Travis Barker trying to get him to hook up with her. She doesn’t describe the fight in that interview.

Moakler wrote an entry on her myspace acknowledging the fight on July 24, but on July 21 she complained that Kardashian distracted some paparazzi she called and said Kardashian “could never get Travis drunk enough” to sleep with her. Then a few days later she admitted she had “a [sic] incident” with her at a party:

I absolutely had a incident at a recent BBQ, it was long over due and I don’t regret it, I had reasons and they were my own, and some of them very painful. I had a feeling the other party would run off to Perez and they did amongst some other things and so I had to go to bat, don’t be pissed cause I speak my mind and I don’t need a PR firm to blow smoke up all your asses…even thou I know you like it…I personally don’t care. I live for me and my family.

[From Shanna Moakler's myspace]

TMZ reports that Kardashian’s response to Moakler was that Barker wasn’t her type at all. Moakler then responded by saying that Kardashian has dated plenty of white guys. Maybe she doesn’t like skinny white guys who look like rats and that’s what she meant:

Come on Kim, Let the truth be told! You have dated numerous white guys. Your quote saying that you are not into white guys is a sham – not a SHIM like you! How about you just be honest Kim and say, “Shanna, I’m sorry for f’n with your man!” It’s that simple… then you can deal with the aftermath from Reggie, you know- your man that you cheated on!”

[From The Dirty]

I feel like I’ve regressed just trying to follow that argument. Shanna Moakler could make anyone look like the more responsible party, and in this case Kardashian seems positively noble in comparison. If Moakler’s just trying to get press she picked a good time since it’s the middle of the summer and most celebrities are vacationing or promoting films, not picking fights online.

Kim Kardashian is shown on 7/22/08, Credit: WENN. Shanna Moakler is shown on 5/21/08 and with Travis Barker on 6/7/08. Credit: WENN and Splash

Posted in Feuds, Kimberly Kardashian, Shanna Moakler

Written by Celebitchy         21 Comments »
Apr 25
'08
Kim Kardashian to get film role, claims to have had dinner with Barack Obama


Kim Kardashian supports Barack Obama in his frustrating but noble bid for the presidency, and claims to have had dinner with him. Her reasoning for voting for the handsome senator from Illinois seems a bit shaky, but maybe she didn’t have a chance to properly explain herself. As for having dinner with Obama, she clarified to a confused E! reporter that she was at an event and it wasn’t like the two of them were alone, although it sounds like she wishes they were:

“I had dinner with him [Obama] once, and he just seemed very firm about the change, and that’s, like, his motto,” Kardashian said, referring to the slogan “Change We Can Believe In.”

Wait a second! Obama and Kardashian had dinner together?

Not exactly. When asked for more details, Kardashian quickly clarified, “It wasn’t just him and I. I was at an event.”

[From Marc Malkin's E! Online column]

Isn’t an endorsement from Kardashian like an endorsement from Heidi Montag? It’s not like they’re going to help get the word out or attract voters. Do they have fans that would be influenced by their political opinions? Because you can’t see those type of people actually voting. More power to them though I guess. We’re all for Obama here, which makes it more annoying that Kim Kardashian claims to have had dinner with him. I want to be the one to turn a fundraising dinner into a romantic evening alone by candlelight, fantasizing about America’s future as Obama speaks his sweet promises, reaching over the steak to lightly touch my hand.

In related Kim Kardashian news, the reality star is going to be “in a major studio film,” according to her own admission. It’s a comedy and E! Online reports that it’s “a spoof flick in the vein of Scary Movie.” Does that mean Kardashian is going to be playing herself? The film starts shooting in May in Louisiana. Look for less photos of Kim Kardashian shopping and tooling around LA during that time.

Kim Kardashian is shown on 4/10/08 at “National Lampoon Presents One, Two, Many,” thanks to PRPhotos.

Posted in Barack Obama, Careers, Kimberly Kardashian

Written by Celebitchy         9 Comments »
Feb 7
'08
Brandy’s mom explains Kim Kardashian lawsuit

Since the news came out that singer Brandy’s mother, Sonja Norwood, has sued Kim Kardashian and her three siblings for stealing her credit card, I have been truly curious to learn the back-story behind this debacle. Kim apparently was Brandy’s stylist in 2004. I had no idea that Kim Kardashian ever had a job, besides supposedly giving or receiving golden showers (yes I forget the specifics of that rumor and am too afraid too look it up). But Kim did do something professional in her life besides going to parties and showing the world her ass cleavage. But I guess she didn’t do it that well – or at least that ethically – because she stole Sonja Norwood’s credit card, loaned it to her three siblings, and the group managed to run up over $120,000 in debt in 2005 – 2006.

“I did not want to commence litigation against the Kardashian family without conducting an exhaustive investigation into the charges and discussing all options, including criminal prosecution, with my family,” Norwood said in a statement Tuesday.

“After Ray J and Brandy urged me not to file criminal charges because of their prior friendship, I decided to afford the Kardashians an opportunity to resolve this matter without a lawsuit,” Norwood said. “When the fraudulent charges were brought to their attention, they apologized profusely, and advised us, through their attorneys, that they would pay the debt in full. However, they have since reneged on that promise.”

Norwood also said in her statement that her “investigation has revealed that the Kardashians used their two stores [Dash and Smooch] and other stores that I have never visited to take advantage of me. I very much look forward to having the Kardashians account for their misconduct in a court of law.”

[From In Touch]

Sonja Norwood’s statement clears up a few issues, but there are a lot of questions remaining. First off, the card was supposedly given to Kim when she worked for the Norwoods in 2004. Yet the charges occurred several years later. Did Sonja Norwood never get the card back, or did Kim steal the number? Secondly, how did the Kardashians sign for these purchases? Were they actually forging Sonja’s signature, or was Kim an authorized signer on the account? No matter what, how did the other three Kardashians use the card? Why did it take Sonja Norwood so long to notice and/or do anything about the fraudulent charges?

What I’m most eager to hear is the Kardashians’ defense. They have obviously denied any wrongdoing, and Kim has said she has documentation for all the purchases. It seems pretty unusual that Brandy’s mother would have Kim Kardashian – who is no longer her employee – use her credit card. It also seems odd that Norwood would randomly choose to sue the Kardashians if they hadn’t done anything wrong. Although considering their father is the late famed O.J. Simpson defense lawyer Robert Kardashian, I’m sure they’ll be able to come up with some sort of entertaining – if not plausible – defense.

Picture Note by JayBird: Header of Kim Kardashian, joined by her ass. Here are the Kardashian sisters (left to right) Kourtney, Kim and Khloe at Kim’s 27th birthday at JET Nightclub in Las Vegas on October 26th. Images thanks to PR Photos.

Posted in Brandy, Khloe Kardashian, Kim Kardashian, Kimberly Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Lawsuits, Money, Photos, Robert Kardashian Jr, Sonja Norwood

Written by JayBird         See post for comments
Page 1 of 3123
 
 
 
Legal Disclaimer| Privacy Policy | Comment Policy