I don’t want to oversell this week’s Star Magazine cover story, but it’s really enjoyable. It’s silly and funny and mostly BS, and if you want to pick up a fun tabloid this weekend, it should be Star. Personally, I never care for the “Best & Worst Bodies” or “Diets” or whatever issues, although I will make an exception for the Best & Worst Dressed of any tabloid. But who would have thought to compile a list of the Best & Worst Hollywood lovers? Genius. Anyway, a lot of celebrities are included in the lengthy cover story, and here are my favorites:

*Angelina Jolie is “boring” (according to Billy Bob Thornton) but Angelina and Brad “regularly do it behind the waterfall in their pool.”

*Channing Tatum “loves getting things going by giving his wife a lap dance, and he often gives Jenna a full body massage after sex!”

*An ex-lover says Colin Farrell is “as wild as Mickey Mouse… we made love three times but the actual sex only lasted 10 minutes.”

*Taylor Swift’s lovers come and go so fast because she’s a prude – “All she wants to do is kiss for hours which is probably why none of the guys she dates stick around!”

*Jennifer Aniston is a “spoiled princess” in bed – “She just lays there and wants to do none of the work… she’ll complain that she’s too tired or that her back hurts. She makes up every excuse to skip sex and never initiates it.”

*Robert Pattinson is “amazing in bed,” says an ex-lover. “We’d glance at each other throughout the night because it made it more exciting when we got home.”

*John Mayer is “sensational in bed” says an ex. “Every girl I know who has slept with John says it was the best sex of her life. I’m not sure how he does it, but after girls sleep with him, they’re ruined – totally hung up on him and left wanting more.”

*Ashton Kutcher prefers threesomes – with two chicks.

*Ben Affleck puts flowers around the bed and he’s into giving massages – and making sure his woman’s needs are taken care of before his own.”

*Blake Lively is a “real sexpot” – she “sends sexy photos and videos to Ryan Reynolds and loves getting in sexy costumes for him. She uses toys while having sex too.”

*Ryan Gosling “has a laser focus when making love – he’s completely in the moment and absolutely amazing.”

*Bradley Cooper is “dull as dishwater in bed… he talks in nonstop French because he thinks it’s a turn-on, but it’s like being in bed with Pepe Le Pew!”

*Adam Levine is more concerned with stretching out than his partners.

*Prince Harry is “very sexual” and “he loves lotions and scented body oils. He knows how to please a lady and make her feel like she’s the only one he’s ever slept with.”

*Jennifer Lopez is a screamer – “If she enjoys what you’re doing, she’ll scream so loud that the windows will rattle.”

Hmm… I think I’ll start with some Channing Tatum, then go for some Prince Harry, and maybe finish up with some Blake Lively.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

I’m about to shock you! Chelsea Handler, star of a vodka-soaked empire, is once again talking about how much she dislikes Angelina Jolie. As you know, Chelsea is faithfully Team Aniston – Chelsea used to make fun of Jennifer Aniston (and everyone else) until Chelsea decided to befriend certain tabloid “sweethearts” and use her act to screech at Angelina Jolie specifically. Chelsea has gone off on Angelina so many times, calling Angelina “a f–king c–t” and a “homewrecker” and making racist jibes at the Jolie-Pitt children. Chelsea also name-drops Jennifer Aniston into nearly every interview she does. And lest you think that “Oh, Aniston doesn’t cosign this…” – sure, you could believe that. Aniston and Handler are tight, though. Chelsea comes to all of Aniston’s premieres, Chelsea came (and spoke at) Aniston’s Hollywood Walk of Fame ceremony, and they consistently vacation together. Anyway, Chelsea has a new interview. Guess what she talks about?

Jennifer Aniston’s loyal close pal Chelsea Handler has blasted Angelina Jolie as “the opposite of a girl’s girl,” saying: “You just know as a woman, when you see another woman, if that’s a woman you can trust.”

Handler, when asked to describe the opposite of a girl’s girl, says in a story in More’s May issue: “Probably Angelina Jolie . . . She [Jolie] doesn’t strike me as someone I would have a close friendship with.”

The “Chelsea Lately” host counts Aniston as one of her closest friends. But while sources say Aniston is happy for her newly engaged ex, Brad Pitt, and Jolie, Handler has refused to apologize for calling Jolie a “home wrecker.”

Handler also talks for the first time about being “madly in love” with hotelier André Balazs — from whom she split last year and reunited with in February. She tells the magazine, out Tuesday: “My boyfriend, André . . . We just got back together literally yesterday. We had dated for nine months, a long-distance relationship with all the stresses and traveling and running around. It wasn’t a real life; we weren’t living together.

“So, André came to me yesterday and said, ‘I think we have to try to make this work again.’ And I agreed because we’re still madly in love, and he has done a lot of the things I’ve asked him to, and I’ve done a lot of the stuff he’s asked me to . . . It’s just a matter of . . . understanding each other better — getting to know what the other person’s needs are and not basing all your behavior on your own desire.”

While he’s New York-based, her show is filmed in LA. “Sometimes you don’t want to fly five hours to go see somebody, but sometimes that person needs you there,” she says. “It’s that kind of selflessness and thoughtfulness.”

On getting married: “I’ve never been proposed to, and I don’t know that that’s in my future . . . I don’t know that I’m marriage material. I don’t know if I would ever want to be someone’s wife. It makes breaking up much more complicated.”

[From Page Six]

I’m sure some people agree with Chelsea’s assessment of Jolie. I’m sure some people think the exact opposite – that Chelsea and Jennifer Aniston seem like they would be horrible people to be friends with. That’s all just a matter of opinion, and everyone’s entitled. But Jesus Christ, does Chelsea have anything else to talk about? Don’t these character attacks – on Angelina specifically – get old? I don’t even feel like it’s part of any comedic “act” – it’s just Chelsea obsessively maintaining her “Team Aniston” status in interviews, in her act, on her show, and everywhere else.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

What is going on lately? First I’m going out of my way to defend Kristen Stewart and now I’m about two seconds away from putting a blanket over my head and screaming “Leaving Aniston ALOOOOOONE!” Much like the Kristen Stewart thing (where she was pounced on for “criticizing Twilight” when she really didn’t), I’m going to wait until Jennifer Aniston actually says something about Brad Pitt and Angelina’s engagement, or until I see a tabloid story (probably in Us Weekly) that is ridiculously sympathetic to Aniston, to the point where it’s obviously a plant by Aniston’s publicist Stephen Huvane. Until that time, I consider all of these “Jennifer doesn’t care, for real” stories to be the fantasies of professional gossips. So, with that in mind, here’s E! News’s story about Aniston not caring:

There are many questions still unanswered about Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s engagement. We all still want to know how the proposal went down, when and where they will say their I-dos and what the wedding dress will look like.

And then there’s Jennifer Aniston—what does she think of all this? Well, I can tell you…

She isn’t thinking much about it—if she is at all.

“She doesn’t care,” an Aniston pal tells me. “She really doesn’t. She’s happy with Justin [Theroux]. She’ll probably marry him. She’s moved on. People don’t want to believe it, but she has.”

No doubt the celebrity tabloids are going to have a field day with Aniston and Brangelina, but be careful of what you read.

Another source tells us Aniston found out about the engagement at home. “She was happy and hanging out with her man,” the source said.

[From E! News]

As I said before, I think Aniston is probably fine. Emotionally and psychologically, she’s in a good place right now with Justin, and yes, they might even get married and/or pregnant. God knows. What will be interesting to see is how Aniston plays it – because even though “people don’t want to believe” that she’s moved on, she’s actively played into that perception for years and years because “Aniston the Victim” is part of her brand. So will she use Brangelina’s engagement to throw another public pity party? Or is has she “moved on” from that as well? I suspect tomorrow’s tabloids will be revealing – not so much In Touch and Star, but I’m definitely interested to see what Us Weekly leads with.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

Back in February, OK! Magazine had a story about the uncool Bermuda Triangle. Of course – I mean, all of the tabloids run weekly stories on all of the variations and possible hookups of Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston. But this one story was particularly funny because it read like Brangelina fan-fiction written by Michael K. It was all about Brad sitting down with his oldest son (Maddox) and explaining how he (Brad) used to be in love with Jennifer Aniston, and of course Angelina walked in and there was a huge blowout fight, etc. Well, The Enquirer has taken up the cause of “Maddox is interesting in knowing who this Aniston woman is” and they’ve just gone full-out. According to The Enquirer’s sources, Maddox recently watched Marley & Me, and now he’s totally in love with Jennifer Aniston.

Angelina Jolie’s 10-year-old son Maddox has developed a king-sized crush on Jennifer Aniston after he and his nanny recently watched “Marley & Me” say sources. Now, Angelina and Brad’s adopted youngster plans to decorate his bedroom with posters of Aniston – and Angelina is freaking out.

“Maddox has become infatuated with Jennifer, and Angelina is fuming,” a close source told The Enquirer. “Maddox just loved Jennifer’s rapport with the pup in the movie and got hung up on her nice smile.”

Now Jen’s newest fan is begging his parents to get him posters of her to put up in his bedroom. Maddox has no idea about the longtime rivalry between his mom and Brad’s ex-wife – or of Jen’s belief that Angelina stole Brad when they were still married eight years ago.

“Maddox simply likes Jen’s sweet face and look,” said the source.

To make matters even more uncomfortable, Jennifer trumped Angelina in a recent magazine beauty poll for “Hottest Woman of All Time”. Angelina finished in 10th place.

“Jennifer is not only winning the puppy love of Angelina’s son but is also beating her in magazine polls,” said the source. “She is incredibly jealous of Jennifer’s girl-next-door image, and believe me, she won’t be letting Maddox put any posters of her on his walls.”

[From The Enquirer, print edition]

Am I the only one who thinks that Angelina would probably laugh her ass off if one of her kids wanted an Aniston poster? Besides that, from what little I know of Maddox, he probably just wants to deface the poster or throw knives at it (Angelina and Brad let Maddox play with knives). Anyway, sure. Jealousy, discomfort, etc. I’m surprised they didn’t include something about Angelina screaming at Brad (“You told him about that woman! It’s your fault!”) and Brad breaking down in tears whilst smoking a bong.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.

Several weeks ago, I wrote about a hilarious and suspicious item in The National Enquirer. It came right on the heels of Bradley Cooper and Renee Zellweger’s breakup, and it was all about how Jennifer Aniston was trying to ride the B. Coop pony once again. Remember, Aniston and Bradley had a minor little thing back in 2009 when they went on some dinner dates. After those dates, Bradley went out of his way to deny that he was dating Aniston, and shortly after that, Us Weekly published an “exposé” about why Bradley and Aniston didn’t work: he thought she was fake, insecure mess.

Anyway, I wrote about the item, and I honestly thought there was probably something there. It seemed like it was perfectly plausible that Aniston was trying to get on Bradley, and it was perfectly plausible that the National Enquirer story had merit, especially when the “source” was saying all kinds of bitchy things about Renee Zellweger (and how Renee “stole” Bradley away from Aniston, because Aniston is always The Victim, Forever). Many of you disagreed with me, throwing a huge pity party for poor Jennifer who WOULD NEVER EVER look at Bradley because… I don’t know, something about Angelina, probably. Well, I told you so. Look who’s publicist got this dropped into People Magazine:

Is it more than a friendly connection? A month after splitting with Renée Zellweger, Bradley Cooper is getting back in touch with Jennifer Aniston.

“In the past few weeks, they have stayed in contact,” a source tells PEOPLE.

The two were first linked in 2009, when they stepped out for dinner in New York, but they didn’t really seem to click until now.

“Jen always had a soft spot for Bradley, and she thinks he is very attractive and charming,” the source says. ” Jen appreciates that Bradley is low-key, loves dogs and is focused on his movie career.”

Cooper, 36, is back in L.A. after promoting his new thriller Limitless in Europe, and the source says the actor plans to spend time with Aniston, 42.

Adds the source: “They have a lot in common.”

[From People]

I earned this, so I’m going to enjoy it: hahahahahahahahahahahaha, suck it. I was right. Here’s what I don’t know: who is pushing this? For the Enquirer story, it was obviously a Team Aniston plant, but I feel like People Magazine wouldn’t have run this story if they didn’t get a nod from both Bradley and Jennifer’s people. We’ll see. If this story stands unchallenged for the next 24 hours, Aniston has gotten herself another Bradley. BUT: Bradley could end up denying this still, like he did before. We’ll see.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

LaineyGossip has been following Elisabetta Canalis’s comings and goings for a while now, even when most of us (me) were pretty sure that Canalis was on the way out. After her seemingly disastrous appearance with George Clooney at this year’s Oscars, I thought she would be long gone. But she’s still with him, and she’s doesn’t give a sh-t if he hates stuff like Facebook and Twitter and any sort of media that would put out a less-than-whitewashed image. Canalis has a Twitter account! It’s kind of unbelievable, but LaineyGossip confirmed it. Here’s Ely’s Twitter feed. It’s mostly in Italian, which I don’t speak, unfortunately.

Anyway, apparently Ely spent her Memorial Day reading magazines and tweeting. Sounds like Lindsay Lohan, actually. But Ely is a bitch, and she’s actually pretty funny, if Lainey’s translation of one particular tweet is accurate. Allegedly, Ely tweeted: “I’m flipping through the new Rolling Stone. Iggy Pop on the cover is the double of Jennifer Aniston.” Oh, GOD. Here’s the original tweet in Italian:

[From Ely Canalis’s Twitter]

Is that an accurate translation? Anyone who speaks Italian, please confirm it or correct it. Now, as to what she said and why she might have said it – well, Ely has met Angelina Jolie. Could it be that Canalis is just a bloodthirsty Team Jolie fangirl? Or that Canalis has had some kind of run-in with Jennifer Aniston and didn’t care for her? Or maybe it’s a larger statement about Iggy Pop and his face? It’s up for interpretation. Actually, not so much. No matter how you look at it, it was pretty bitchy!

Header: Elisabetta Canalis with Clooney on January 17, 2010. Credit: WENN.

The NY Post [via US Weekly] has a pretty damning article about how Jennifer Aniston’s career is faring post-Friends. They quote an anonymous “movie critic” who claims that Aniston is a one note wonder who is no longer young enough to play the romantic lead in films. She’s still doing it, although it’s unknown how much longer she’ll be able to pull it off after the dismal box office performance of her last few films, particularly her latest – Bounty Hunter. The Post’s source also has some snarky things to say about her taste in men, and I don’t disagree with them:

Even some of Jennifer Aniston’s most devoted fans think she should take some time off and reassess her career after her latest flop. “The Bounty Hunter,” a heavily promoted romantic comedy with Gerard Butler, has pulled in just $38.4 million domestically in its first 10 days of release.

Last year’s “Love Happens,” another romantic comedy with Aaron Eckhart, grossed $22.9 million in the US — which was still way ahead of last year’s “Management” with Steve Zahn, which grossed a pathetic $935,000.

“Aniston just can’t play the good friend anymore. She’s aged out, no matter the yoga and the highlights. She just can’t do America’s sweetheart next door. She needs a big wake-up call,” one film critic who didn’t want to be named told Page Six.

“And as for her taste in men, it’s totally off. John Mayer? Gerard Butler? She’s missing a common-sense gene.”
One movie producer who also asked to be nameless said, “It’s hard for any TV stars to make the transition to movies. Certainly no one else from ‘Friends’ made it.”

As to why Aniston can’t break out of the rut and make an action film or thriller, like Angelina Jolie, the producer said, “You don’t go from ‘Friends’ to ‘Transformers.’ Jennifer is just like one of 15 princesses from Great Neck we met at summer camp.”

Though Aniston apparently won’t take a vacation, there is some hope, according to IMDB.com. After “The Switch,” a turkey-baster comedy with Jason Bateman, and “Just Go With It,” in which Nicole Kidman will help Adam Sandler “land the woman of his dreams,” Aniston is set to star in “The Goree Girls,” a musical set in the 1940s about a group of incarcerated country-western performers.

[From The NY Post]

You know, I could go either way on Aniston. I don’t see her appeal nor do I seek out her films, but I don’t get why people dislike her so thoroughly, either. I also don’t think it’s all her fault that her movies aren’t doing that well at the box office. These type of tepid romantic comedies aren’t faring as well lately, especially when pitted against family-friendly blockbuster 3D fare like Alice in Wonderland and How To Train Your Dragon. On the other hand, the film has only grossed $38.4 million in ten days and is unlikely to approach the $88 million domestic take of another romantic comedy also co-starring Gerard Butler – The Ugly Truth. When Katherine Heigl is a bigger box office draw, you know Aniston is in trouble.

As The Post pointed out, Aniston has a couple more romantic comedies coming out before she has a chance to change directions with Goree Girls. Will it be too little too late from Aniston, or will she show us a different side? Judging from her recent interview with Harper’s Bazaar, I’m thinking we’ve seen and heard just about everything we can from her. You never know, though, she could surprise us.

Aniston at various ‘Bounty Hunter’ premieres. Credit: WENN.

Note: this video is cut short and the website they mention makes you fill out a survey to view the full video, which I cannot vouch for. It’s the best quality I could find. There’s another clip below.

Yesterday when I covered Jennifer Aniston’s interviews on Regis and Kelly and Good Morning America I mentioned that I was interested in seeing how she would do on tonight’s Late Show with David Letterman. The last time Aniston was on Letterman, in December 2008, she had an uncomfortable appearance in which she seemed flustered by Dave’s questions. Many of you pointed out that it’s Letterman’s job to make the guest feel comfortable, but I could counter that it’s the guest’s job to have prepared a story to tell and to have worked out the details with the host ahead of time.

Aniston was much better on last night’s show, and given Gawker’s coverage I was expecting it to be a disaster. Dave was a little silly with her, but she was really comfortable and funny and rolled with the punches. She even had a cute story to tell about how she got temporarily abandoned in the trunk of a car while filming Bounty Hunter.

On her inclusion in Architectural Digest
After some goofy banter with Dave, he brought out Aniston’s spread in Architectural Digest, which she also discussed on Regis & Kelly yesterday. She explained why her home was profiled, and it had nothing to do with inserting herself into ex husband Brad’s bathroom reading material. “My architect has been in this magazine many times and he has a relationship with them, and I felt like it was kind of an honor. And I also really wanted to celebrate the craftsmen that worked so unbelievably hard and created one of the most exquisite homes… I’ve never seen such beautiful work.” When Dave asked Aniston to explain her home in a sentence, she said simply “sexy, comfortable.” She also revealed that it’s 10,000 square feet and joked that she sometimes swims in the koi pond at the entrance to her home.

When Dave kept looking for more pictures in Architectural Digest, he thumbed to the back and showed a fake article on himself in which he a one small one story home was pictured with the subtitle “Dave’s suburban jewel.”

Dave also showed the sexy cover of W Magazine that Aniston did with Gerard Butler, and then they brought down the tie that she wore on the cover of GQ for that sexy spread. She gifted it to Dave on her last appearance, and he held it up, saing “Gerry eat your heart out.” Now I can’t wait to see Butler on The Late Show tomorrow night, but you know that Kaiser will be covering that! On a purely superficial level, I really don’t like Aniston’s hair all messy like that with a bobby pin in the side. It makes it look like she needs a haircut.

photo credit: L. Gallo/WENN.com

Jennifer Aniston is joining the ranks of other celebrities by putting out her own signature scent. Her rep confirms the news, but says that the fragrance doesn’t yet have a name. I bet it will be something Spanish and evocative of the beach. Damn her and her multi million dollar bachelorette lifestyle.

Aside from the whole post-Brad Pitt-Angelina Jolie pity-party story line that’s been perpetuated by the tabloids for the past five years, Jennifer Aniston is the ultimate aspirational brand.

We want her shiny, shiny golden tresses and preternaturally toned, bikini-ready body. But without a personal mane wrangler and a yoga instructor on call 24-7, that’s unlikely to happen. Instead, maybe we can just make do with smelling like the winsome star.

with a crowded and aromatic field that includes Britney Spears, Jessica Simpson, Reese Witherspoon, Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, Sarah Jessica Parker and Jennifer Lopez.

Details of the scent are sketchy at the moment but will be released soon.

According to OK!, Jen, who recently celebrated her 41st birthday with a Mexican getaway, has been developing the perfume for nearly two years, although she is apparently on the fence about what to call it.

[From Wonderwall, thanks to Jade for the tip!]

Let me just say that after I was exposed to mold in an apartment I was living in I’m very sensitive to perfume, some of which gives me a headache. (Not all perfumes, just some.) So I have zero love for any kind of fragrance. If you like to smell like something unique and subtle good for you, but if you reek so bad that it makes me dizzy I’m going to give you the side eye. And don’t ever wear perfume to the gym, damnit! There’s no reason to get your fake-smelling stink all over the exercise room. (I’d prefer to smell b.o. to be honest) Same goes for you and your yoga matt, Jen. I just don’t get the idea of people wanting to smell like celebrities. Sure we want their hair, clothes and bodies but to smell like them? Ridiculous.

Due to my sensitivity I consider celebrity perfumes one of the cheapest marketing gimmicks around, although some celebrities I admire have put out perfumes. (Ok, the only two I can come up with are Halle Berry and Reese Witherspoon, apart from all the actresses that have endorsed other designer fragrances, like Uma Thurman and Liv Tyler.) Despite the A-Listers with perfumes, it still seems like a really douche move. Like who doesn’t have a perfume out? They’re kind of below clothing lines in my estimation. That said, Aniston should have put out her own line of comfortable everyday clothing. I know there are a lot of people who don’t like her style, but she wears very nice staple pieces and basics. Aniston manages to look effortlessly stylish and comfortable without wearing workout gear everywhere (like Renee Zellweger) and that’s an accomplishment. I would dress like her occasionally and I wouldn’t mind having her hair, I just wouldn’t want to smell like something she put together in a lab to be able to afford more trips with all her friends to Mexico. It would probably give me a headache anyway.

This week’s OK! Magazine has an interesting twist on the ridiculous John Mayer interview from Playboy. Because covers with women usually sell better than covers with men, they’re focusing on how John Mayer “betrayed” Jessica Simpson by enthusing about how great their sex life was and how he was addicted to her like a drug. He also went on at length about how much he still cared for Jennifer Aniston and didn’t want her reading his comments on Simpson, but it was like a backhanded compliment meant to highlight the differences between the two women.

So far, Simpson has only maybe-referred to John’s interview with a brief tweet that read “interesting day so far…hmm…at least i am boxing 2-a-days [sic] this week.” (Is she boxing twice a day or 2 days?) According to OK! she’s annoyed that “John would sink so low,” but they’re probably just guessing. The way I imagine it, she laughed and shrugged her shoulders at the stupid sh*t that Jon said. She knows this guy well and she’s familiar with the level of crap he’s capable of spouting, even though she probably took it super seriously at the time. Plus, the story about how he was so addicted to her that he wanted to “snort” her was quickly eclipsed by the other, some say racist, quotes in his interview. Overall he really needs to keep some secrets for his therapist. Did it bother Jessica, though? OK! says so, although they probably should have gone with the angle that Jennifer Aniston was either mad or touched by Mayer’s interview. He did say “I love Jen so much” even though he also said she was hoping that technology would go back to 1998 at the height of her fame.

Jessica Simpson was stunned on Feb. 10 when she awoke to a flood of texts, e-mails and Tweets asking if she had seen ex-flame John Mayer’s Playboy interview. That would be the cringingly frank spill-all in which he likened her to “sexual napalm” and “crack cocaine.”

“Jessica was shocked,” a pal of the singer tells OK!. “She was really pissed off at first when she heard about it, then she read the whole interview, and the first thing that she said was, ‘I’m annoyed John would sink so low.’ ”

Facing a barrage of criticism, John, 32, expressed regret that night at a concert in Nashville. “I quit the media game,” he told the crowd at Sommet Center, voice choked with emotion. “I’m out. I’m done. I just want to play my guitar… I completey forgot about the people that I love and that love me.”

For more on Jessica and John’s show-down, and how she’ll confront him, pick up the new issue of OK! — on sale everywhere Thursday!

[From OK!]

I don’t believe all that. Maybe Simpson was mortified at Mayer’s quotes, but maybe she was secretly pleased too. He went on about how great their sex life was and while he mentioned Aniston he didn’t say much about their connection. Jess is learning to be her own person and she could be dating Billy Corgan, judging by recent rumors and some choice quotes in her Allure interview. She also said that she didn’t learn anything from her past relationships and that Mayer wasn’t the one who influenced her to become a brunette during their relationship. She’s so over the douche.

Star Magazine has a similar take on Mayer’s interview, except they double-down with both Jessica and Jen “stabbed in the heart” by the interview. They say that Simpson is “angry and embarrassed” while Aniston is “taking this really personally.” I don’t know. I would think both of these women would just be relieved to be rid of the ass, but I’m not having all my dirty laundry strung up in public so I can’t tell. Mayer manages to make all his ex girlfriends look bad just by opening his mouth. It almost doesn’t matter if he name drops them or not.

Covers courtesy of CoverAwards.